Predlog je, da se ruska sredstva uporabijo kot zavarovanje za nove obveznice, ki jih izda EU, za financiranje nadaljnjih transferjev v Ukrajino. Klju\u010dni problem: ne morete zavarovati tistega, kar ni va\u0161e. Celo latvijski uradnik in GD FISMA sta priznala, da ta sredstva niso last EU in nikoli ne bodo. To na\u010drt naredi nevzdr\u017enega: vlagatelji ne bodo zaupali obveznicam, zavarovanim s premo\u017eenjem, ki ga EU ne poseduje in ki ga bo morda treba vrniti Rusiji. Med zasli\u0161anjem je pri\u0161lo do resni\u010dnega priznanja: edini dejanski poroki za ta dolg bi bile same dr\u017eave \u010dlanice. V resnici ni na kocki denar Rusije, ampak denar davkopla\u010devalcev EU.<\/p>\n
Rada Laykova, \u010dlanica skupine ESN in odbora ECON, je opisala zasli\u0161anje:<\/p>\n
\u201cRetorika o \u2018mobilizaciji\u2019 sredstev in moralni pozivi glede ruskih kr\u0161itev prikrivajo resnico. EU posku\u0161a zavesti Parlament in javnost, da podprejo prikrite evroobveznice \u2013 kar je v skladu s pogodbami EU izrecno prepovedano. Ti instrumenti ustvarjajo skupni dolg med dr\u017eavami \u010dlanicami, kar je prepovedano celo za uporabo znotraj EU. Zdaj pa je na\u010drt, da se jih izda ne za Evropo, ampak za Ukrajino, eno izmed dr\u017eav, ki so najbolj znane po korupciji, kjer so se pretekla sredstva izgubila v nekaj mesecih.<\/p>\n
To ni \u2018solidarnost\u2019, temve\u010d odkrito ropanje Evropejcev. Dr\u017eavljani bi nosili celotno breme dolga, medtem ko bi jih zavajali v prepri\u010danje, da jih bodo zamrznjena ruska sredstva za\u0161\u010ditila. Resni\u010dnost je tak\u0161na: tu ne gre za Ukrajino ali Rusijo, temve\u010d za zaobidenje pravil EU in vsiljevanje prepovedanega skupnega dolga. Domnevno rusko zavarovanje je le dimna zavesa.<\/p>\n
Ne smemo dopustiti, da bi Parlament pod vplivom manipulacij glasoval za krajo prihodnosti svojih dr\u017eavljanov.\u2019<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The proposal is to use Russian assets as collateral for new EU-issued bonds to finance further transfers to Ukraine. The key problem: you cannot collateralize what is not yours. Even […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":2604,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"esn_date_approx":true,"footnotes":"","_wp_rev_ctl_limit":""},"categories":[39,37],"tags":[42],"class_list":["post-2603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy-currency","category-migration-borders","tag-press-release"],"acf":{"activity_type":"","activity_location":"","related_mep":null,"news_location":"","news_byline":"ESN Group Press Office","news_readtime":"2 min read","news_intro":"Last Thursday, the ECON Committee hosted a one-sided hearing on the so-called \u201cmobilization\u201d of frozen Russian assets, valued at around \u20ac200 billion and held at Euroclear. Critical voices were absent; the \u201cexperts\u201d were handpicked to support a predetermined outcome, led by the deputy director of the Latvian Financial Intelligence Unit.","news_photo":2604,"news_photo_caption":""},"yoast_head":"\n