Arda\u00edonn c\u00e1ineadh na C\u00fairte ceisteanna bun\u00fasacha, go h\u00e1irithe i r\u00e9imse pholasa\u00ed aer\u00e1ide agus comhshaoil na hEorpa. I measc ruda\u00ed eile, tarraing\u00edonn na ini\u00fach\u00f3ir\u00ed aird ar easpa rialacha soil\u00e9ire maidir le bainist\u00edocht an chiste agus ar laig\u00ed strucht\u00faracha i ndearadh an chiste. D\u00e9antar an ch\u00faiteamh c\u00falghabh\u00e1lach at\u00e1 beartaithe do bhearta at\u00e1 curtha i gcr\u00edch cheana f\u00e9in a mheas go critici\u00fail freisin, toisc go mbaineann s\u00e9 le prionsabail l\u00e1rnacha na rialachais bhuis\u00e9adaigh shl\u00e1imhe.<\/p>\n
I gcomhth\u00e9acs na n-ionstraim\u00ed at\u00e1 ann cheana, amhail an C\u00f3ras Tr\u00e1d\u00e1la Asta\u00edochta\u00ed (ETS) agus an Meicn\u00edocht um Choigeart\u00fa Carb\u00f3in ag an Teorainn (CBAM), t\u00e1 an d\u00edosp\u00f3ireacht maidir le h\u00e9ifeacht\u00falacht, spriocdh\u00edri\u00fa, agus tionchar comhshaoil pholasa\u00ed aer\u00e1ide reatha an AE ag g\u00e9ar\u00fa.<\/p>\n
D\u00fairt Anja Arndt, Feisire de Pharlaimint na hEorpa \u00f3 an AfD agus ball den Choiste um an gComhshaol, um Shl\u00e1inte Phoibl\u00ed agus um Sh\u00e1bh\u00e1ilteacht Bia (ENVI):<\/p>\n
\u201cDeimhn\u00edonn C\u00fairt na nIni\u00fach\u00f3ir\u00ed: t\u00e1 polasa\u00ed aer\u00e1ide na Bruis\u00e9ile costasach, bi\u00far\u00f3cratach, agus naimhdeach don tionscal. Ag an am c\u00e9anna, b\u00edonn meath ar an gcomhshaol agus br\u00fa \u00e9iceola\u00edoch breise mar thoradh air de bharr an leathnaithe ollmh\u00f3ir ar chumhacht gaoithe agus gr\u00e9ine. Le ETS 1, cuirtear n\u00edos m\u00f3 br\u00fa ar chuideachta\u00ed tionscla\u00edocha de bharr t\u00e1ill\u00ed arda. L\u00e9ir\u00edonn an ciste d\u00edcharb\u00f3n\u00fach\u00e1in at\u00e1 beartaithe an chaoi a gcrutha\u00edonn an Bhruis\u00e9il fadhbanna ar dt\u00fas agus ansin a dh\u00e9anann s\u00ed iarracht a teipeanna polasa\u00ed f\u00e9in a cheilt le sc\u00e9imeanna nua athdh\u00e1ilthe.\u2019<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Court\u2019s criticism raises fundamental questions, particularly in the area of European climate and environmental policy. Among other things, the auditors point to a lack of clear rules for fund […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":2370,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"esn_date_approx":true,"footnotes":"","_wp_rev_ctl_limit":""},"categories":[75,37],"tags":[42],"class_list":["post-2369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy-climate","category-migration-borders","tag-press-release"],"acf":{"activity_type":"","activity_location":"","related_mep":null,"news_location":"","news_byline":"ESN Group Press Office","news_readtime":"1 min read","news_intro":"In its newly published Opinion 13\/2026, the European Court of Auditors has identified serious shortcomings in the European Commission\u2019s planned Temporary Decarbonization Fund. The auditors warn that, if implemented in its proposed form, sound financial management of the funds cannot be ensured.","news_photo":2370,"news_photo_caption":""},"yoast_head":"\n